Calls for investigation into ‘misleading’ financial institution debt letters
Wonga sent ‘fake’ debt chasing letters. Banks are now accused of sending letters that wrongly recommended the debt had been escalated to a third party 
Photograph: GETTY Images
Client campaigners are urging the regulator to investigate worries that customers of key banks have been sent Wonga-style letters chasing them for payments.
Clients of Lloyds, Halifax, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), NatWest, Ulster Financial institution, Barclaycard and HSBC acquired letters which have been from either attorneys or debt collectors which have been actually manufacturers operating inside these respective banking groups.
Banking institutions mentioned it was manufactured clear in these letters that the companies sending them had been primarily based in-house. But considerations have been raised that, as in the situation of payday loan provider Wonga, some folks may nonetheless have wrongly got the impression that the debt had been escalated to an outside third party, creating them really feel below pressure to spend up.
Banks mentioned they have given that stopped utilizing the different brand names altogether or are phasing them out. It also emerged that some utility companies have also chased debts using the names of various brands based inside their organizations.
A crucial distinction amongst the letters sent on behalf of the banking institutions and utility companies and these from Wonga is that the letters involving banks and utility firms were from genuine organisations, although the Wonga letters have been from firms which did not exist.
Citizens Advice wants the Monetary Perform Authority (FCA) to think about regardless of whether, like in Wonga’s case, people who have obtained such letters must get compensation, and Which? stated the regulator must delve further into precisely how banks communicate with buyers who owe them income.
Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury Committee, also voiced considerations, saying: “Buyers ought to know who they are dealing with – it appears they may possibly not have done. I will be creating to the banking institutions for clarification.”
The FCA mentioned it is conscious of reports about the incidents and it needs to hear from any person who has more data about this variety of practice.
A furore erupted final week when it emerged that Wonga had sent fake legal letters to buyers. The payday lender is having to pay a complete of £2.six million in compensation following sending the correspondence to all around 45,000 people.
The City of London Police are currently hunting yet again at the incident involving Wonga to see if further action is necessary. It also just lately emerged that the Pupil Loans Business has, in the past, sent out letters which were feared to be possibly “misleading”.
Richard Lloyd, Which? executive director, stated: “Banking institutions have a duty to treat clients struggling with debt fairly and provide clear and up-front details. These practices seem to be to be made to put strain on individuals and the FCA need to now investigate how banking institutions communicate with clients who owe money.
“Customer believe in in the banking sector is very minimal and to tackle this, we need to have to see a massive change in how banks operate so they function for customers, not bankers.”
Citizens Suggestions chief executive Gillian Man explained: “It can be extremely distressing and intimidating for individuals in debt to acquire letters from debt collectors. Debt collection letters need to be clear about who the actual letter is from, what the debt is for and how borrowers can get independent advice if they want it.”The FCA needs to meticulously examine situations where debt collection processes are not clear and consider no matter whether compensation for clients is suitable.”
Consumers of RBS Group, which includes Royal Financial institution of Scotland, NatWest and Ulster Financial institution, acquired letters from law firm Green & Co and debt collection firm Triton, which have been each in-house. It is understood that these firms’ back links to RBS had been stated in the letters. Green & Co has not taken any new business since 2012 and a decision was taken earlier this year to phase out the Triton brand.
A spokeswoman for RBS explained: “Our customers need to never ever be in any doubt about who they are communicating with. We have reviewed our policies in this region and will quit the use of any solicitor or debt assortment brand names in correspondence with our clients that could lead to confusion.”
A Barclaycard spokesman confirmed Mercers Debt Collections Limited had previously managed some collections operate on behalf of Barclaycard. He explained all debt collections are now carried out below the Barclaycard identify, following a determination taken in April.
The spokesman said of Mercers Debt Collections: “It was manufactured clear to clients that they had been a business inside of the Barclays Group and collecting on our behalf.
“Mercers Debt Collections Constrained was set up to control far more serious arrears and is in the process of being wound down. The workers have transferred to dealing with these accounts underneath the Barclaycard identify as an alternative.”
Lloyds has utilized Sechiari, Clarke and Mitchell (SCM) Solicitors, which has been part of the group given that the 1980s. Its sister banking institutions, Halifax and Financial institution of Scotland, used an in-property debt recovery firm, Blair, Oliver and Scott (BOS), which was formed in the 1990s.
It is understood that it was made clear in the far more latest letters from these two firms that they were operating below the Lloyds umbrella, despite the fact that due to the historic nature of the letters it is not possible to say if this was the situation for every single single piece of correspondence ever sent out.
A Lloyds Banking Group spokeswoman said: “We carry on to simplify our business to ensure that we support our consumers in the most simple, simple and transparent approaches feasible.
“As element of the simplification of our collections and recoveries operation BOS ceased working in November 2013 and from earlier this 12 months we created the determination to phase out the use of SCM.”
HSBC used DG Solicitors, an in-home legal firm which is now closed. It mentioned all its letters have been compliant with debt recovery guidelines and made it clear that they had been from HSBC’s in-house firm of solicitors and that its people have been HSBC staff.
It continued: “HSBC stopped using its legal firm DG Solicitors in January 2014 and legal correspondence to these customers is now underneath the HSBC brand.”
Asked about the calls for even more investigation into how debts are recovered, the FCA stated in a statement: “The FCA is unable to comment on the actions of individual firms, but we are aware of these reviews.
“We would request that anyone who has even more info about this type of practice passes it onto the FCA.”
Anglian Water, which supplies households in the East of England, also explained these days that it has previously employed the name Frontier to speak to “challenging to attain” buyers who had selected not to pay out their bills, but it stopped making use of this name of its personal volition last 12 months.
It explained that it was always manufactured clear in correspondence that Frontier was a trading name of Anglian Water and it now makes use of independent agencies to reach buyers who have not paid their water bill and not contacted it to request for help.
The Day-to-day Mail quoted retired constructing company proprietor Peter Killan, 73, who mentioned he received a “threatening” letter from what he believed to be a debt assortment firm after receiving a bill from ScottishPower. Soon after reading through the correspondence more closely, he realised the letter was sent from the energy organization itself.
Mr Killan, from Saddleworth in the Manchester spot, informed the newspaper: “The wording of it was really threatening. They are making an attempt to frighten people.”
A spokesman for ScottishPower explained: “Sterling Collections is a part of Scottish Power’s debt recovery process. All customer communications referencing Sterling Collections clearly state that ‘Sterling Collections is a trading identify of ScottishPower Vitality Retail Ltd’.
“ScottishPower is presently undertaking a review of its debt recovery channels such as Sterling Collections.”